Seattle Home Inspector's Blog

head_left_image

Child “POOF” Receptacles! Time for new Tamper Resistant Receptacles

Effective with adoption of the 2008 National Electrical Code, was the requirement for installation of Tamper Resistant Receptacles at ALL 120 volt receptacles.

Tamper Resistant ReceptaclesThe idea behind the requirement for this type of receptacle is the protection of children from shock.  It is an attempt to eliminate one of the most common ways that children learn about electricity—by sticking some pointy metal object into the slot of a receptacle.

The reality is that a lot of things have to be in place to create a scenario where a kid would actually “electrocute” themselves.  However kids more susceptible to injury from shock, or injury from burns will now be protected from injury with the installation of these receptacles.

When I first heard these were being proposed back around 2006, my first reaction was: “Everywhere?”  Do they really need to be installed behind the refrigerator?  Do they really need to be installed in the soffit for the ice melting tape?  Do they really need to be installed at the HVAC receptacle up in the attic?  Do they really need to be installed at the receptacle behind the wall mount television in the living room? 

Do they really need to be installed anywhere that is not readily accessible to children?

Fortunately the State of Washington had the same questions and while it adopted the 2008 versions of the NEC, they have amended it to state that not all receptacles have to be Tamper Resistant type.  (WAC 296-46B-406)

The code was amended to basically require them to be installed only where younger children are likely to have access to them.  This only makes sense in my opinion.  Since municipalities can make the codes more restrictive if they choose, some jurisdictions, like Seattle, are sticking with the un-amended NEC and you will see them just about everywhere in a newly constructed Seattle home or remodel--without exception.  You will have to check with your own jurisdiction as to what is required in your area.

Rather than provide a list of all of the places they originally had to be installed, it is much easier to provide the list of the five exceptions to the requirement for installation.

This type of receptacle is not required (not the exact wording):

1.     At receptacles located more than 66 inches above the finished floor.

2.     At receptacles that are part of a luminaire (light fixture) or appliance.

3.     At receptacles behind appliances, that in normal use, are not easily moved.

4.     At non-grounded (two prong) type receptacle replacements.

5.     At receptacles above countertops.

With the exception of #4 this means, basically, any place that is out of reach of a rug rat does not have to be Tamper Resistant.  These exceptions actually bring the whole notion of Tamper Resistant Receptacles a little closer to common sense.

Child protectionWell why not at #4, you might ask?  In most cases, if there is no ground wire, the risk of shock by sticking something in the hot side of the receptacle goes WAY down.  While I personally don’t agree with this exception it is nonetheless on the list.  I know of lots of older homes with flexible metal covered wire (BX) that creates grounding to the metal boxes and thus to the receptacles attached to them whereby there would be just as much potential for shock as with modern wiring.  But alas, they did not ask me when they were writing the exceptions and one has to wonder who they did ask.

In older types of receptacles if a child (or stupid adult) makes contact with the hot components of the receptacle AND is touching something grounded then there could indeed be a considerable experience with the flow of electricity.  Being barefoot or on ones knees on a cement floor, or touching the ground screw of the cover plate---or worse yet a metal cover plate, could indeed result in a shock or even death.

As amended by the State of Washington, I think these Tamper Resistant Receptacles are a great idea.  As an inspector they are so much easier to deal with than most of the aftermarket protective devices that one can put around or in the receptacle openings.

Of course the receptacle in the following picture, found in a child’s bedroom, is much closer to a “child POOF” receptacle than a “child proof” receptacle.

 Broken Receptacle

 

Charles Buell, Real Estate Inspections in Seattle

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Seattle Home Inspector

 

The Human Rights Campaign   QR code for Charles Buell Inspections Inc  ASHI.org

 

WA State, Home Inspector Advisory Licensing Board

Comment balloon 25 commentsCharles Buell • July 28 2013 09:00AM
Child “POOF” Receptacles! Time for new Tamper Resistant Receptacles
share
Effective with adoption of the 2008 National Electrical Code, was the requirement for installation of Tamper Resistant Receptacles at ALL 120 volt receptacles. The idea behind the requirement for this type of receptacle is the protection of… more
Symmetrical eclecticism---what else?
share
There is arguably no bigger difference between housing on the East Coast and housing on the West Coast than notions of “symmetry. ” On the East coast (and please don’t start throwing the exceptions at me--I know they exist—plenty of them—I am just… more
Humidifier gone wild!
share
For the most part, air conditioning in residential construction along coastal Washington State is not very common. Some would argue that for the most part, it is not necessary in relation to its cost when compared to how often it is needed. … more
My Tin-foil hat will protect me!
share
In the spirit of all things tin-foil, as long as I wear my tin-foil hat, when I am cooking and have my range hood running, I will surely be protected. Range hood ductwork is required to be SMOOTH WALL metal pipe. While it is in the… more
Go ask Alice---I think she’ll know….
share
The listing very well could have said: “Fur-lined and insulated ductwork throughout! ” One never knows what one is going to see in the listing information. As you can see from this picture of the return air duct there is considerable… more
Am I on Candid Camera?
share
Sometimes I truly think that people do things in their home with the sole purpose of seeing how hard they can make the inspector laugh. The following plumbing problem I came across on a recent inspection might make anyone familiar with the… more
Bacon flavored lemon cake!
share
Imagine I have a layer cake made of alternating layers of Termite infested wood, Moisture Ant carton, and wood decay/rot. Imagine that I then deliciously frost this entire cake with new siding and trim, and paint it up as nice as lipstick on a pig… more
Tin-foil hats and other realities
share
Like most of my readers, I have been known to occasionally don a tin-foil hat when necessary, have avoided stepping on cracks and certainly tilted at necessary windmills. Science usually makes us give up our wishful thinking (the desire for… more
Being on your guard for dangers.
share
Your deck is 14” off the ground. You know it does not need a guard (barrier railing in lay terms). A guard is only required when the deck gets to be more than 30 from grade (plus some other rules that we are not going into right now). The… more
Hot enough to peel the skin off a rock!
share
What happens when you take the pressure relief valve vent stack, from a hot water boiler, and run it through a single-ply PVC roof? How hot does water get in a boiler? Well since we are heating water under pressure it can easily reach… more